The Law School Boom and Bust

The Law School Boom and Bust
Profile photo of Doug French

law-300x199Reprinted from

If everyone could just have a college degree imagine how prosperous America would be? That’s the idea behind free community college tuition and cheap government insured student loan debt. There is no sense stopping at undergraduate, maybe we should all have a law degree?

Josh Mitchell writes in the Wall Street Journal about, “a business network called the InfiLaw System, backed by Chicago private-equity investors. Enrollment soared from several dozen at Florida Coastal in 1996 to roughly 4,000 at the three schools combined in 2012.”

Would-be future barristers paid tuition with a flood of student loan debt. “Federal student loans were central to the venture’s wild growth,” writes Mitchell. “Taxpayers could wind up on the hook for large chunks of InfiLaw student debt that never gets paid back, and the student borrowers face years of damaged credit.”

In a 2011 piece for, I viewed higher education through an Austrian Business Cycle lens. “College degrees are similar to what the Austrians call higher-order goods. It’s thought that a student will gain knowledge and seasoning in college that will make him or her more productive and a candidate for a high-paying career. The investment of time and money in knowledge pays through higher productivity and is translated into higher income. Higher education is the higher-order means to a successful career.”

Meanwhile, education entrepreneurs like Don Lively found student loan rent-seeking irresistible. His law schools were the fastest-growing in the country. However, Lively’s bubble popped. Mitchell explains,

Now, two decades after it all started, Mr. Lively’s mission is in tatters. The Charlotte school closed in August after North Carolina revoked its license. Enrollment in Arizona and Florida is down sharply, and InfiLaw is looking for buyers for both schools. Thousands of InfiLaw students have dropped out, transferred or failed state bar exams and are struggling to pay down a total of more than $1 billion in federal student loans, Education Department and American Bar Association data indicate. Many owe more than $100,000.

Mr. Lively believed law schools were too discriminating when selecting students using LSAT scores. “Selectivity helped schools achieve higher rankings but limited opportunities for minorities, who tended to score worse on tests than whites for a range of reasons still hotly debated by academics,” writes Mitchell.

Applicants with low LSAT scores were allowed to take an accelerated course followed by an exam to win admission. Andrew McAdams, who taught at the Charlotte school from 2014 to 2015, told the WSJ that all the students scored very poorly and were “grossly unprepared” for law school. “I just can’t in good faith see any of these students getting in,” he recalls. However, he believes five or six were admitted.

With students flooding in, Sterling Partners supplied more capital. “There was ‘surplus demand’ for legal education, he says. About 100,000 people were applying to law schools every year, but only about half were accepted, American Bar Association data show.”

In 2006, adding fuel to the fire, Congress approved a loan program known as Grad Plus, allowing graduate students to borrow unlimited sums to cover tuition and living costs. Prior to Grad Plus, the limit was $18,500 a year.

Law schools used Grad Plus more than any other higher-education sector, according to Education Department data. Mitchell writes, “InfiLaw students eventually piled up more than $700 million in Grad Plus debt, and another $300 million from older loan programs, Education Department data show.”

While the debt piled up, not enough jobs appeared for graduates of InfiLaw graduates. I mentioned InfiLaw’s Charlotte school in a 2015 piece.

The assumption is those high-pay jobs, (A) will require a college degree, and (B) they will be plentiful when the student graduates. Borrowing $100,000 to earn a law degree is a malinvestment if the student ends up writing briefs for $15 per hour. A recent graduate of the Charlotte School of Law put fliers on cars announcing that he or she had borrowed $200,000 to attend school and is now working at Walmart for $35,000 a year.

A post on the “Above The Law” blog revealed, “As of the 2013–2014 academic year, the total cost of a three-year J.D. degree from Charlotte Law was $123,792.00, while the median loan debt per graduate was $159,208.00. Just 34 percent of the class of 2014 was employed in full-time, long-term jobs where bar passage was required. …”

The Charlotte school was closed in August. Fewer than one in five original members of the class of 2016 graduated, passed the bar exam and landed a job that required a law degree.

The law school boom peaked in 2010 and now law school enrollment has fallen to levels last seen in the 1970s.

Profile photo of Doug French

Douglas E. French is a Director of the Ludwig von Mises Institute of Canada. Additionally, he writes for Casey Research and is the author of three books; Early Speculative Bubbles and Increases in the Supply of Money, The Failure of Common Knowledge, and Walk Away: The Rise and Fall of the Home-Owenrship Myth. French is the former president of the Ludwig von Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama.

More in Articles


Why Do People Assign Value to Paper Money?

Frank ShostakSeptember 14, 2018


Per BylundSeptember 13, 2018

Facebook icon LinkedIn icon Twitter icon On The Duty Of Natural Outlaws To Shut Up

Murray N. RothbardSeptember 12, 2018

Paul Krugman Is Learning the Wrong Lesson from Denmark

Daniel J. MitchellSeptember 11, 2018
Screen Shot 2018-08-24 at 7.27.57 PM

How US Sugar Subsidies Bring a Red Tide of Algae to Florida’s Shores

Mark ThorntonSeptember 10, 2018

The Problem with Historical Illustrations of Free-Banking Systems

Jesus Huerta de SotoSeptember 7, 2018

How to Manipulate People with Interest Rates

Frank ShostakSeptember 6, 2018
Screen Shot 2018-08-19 at 7.31.47 AM

Can Bernie Sanders Make Socialism Great Again?

Daniel J. MitchellSeptember 5, 2018
Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 8.15.50 AM

When Mainstream Economics Was Wrong, Mark Thornton Was Right

Thomas E. Woods Jr.September 4, 2018

Ludwig von Mises Institute Canada Inc.
2574 St. Clair Ave West
Unit 1 Suite #181
Toronto, ON M6N 1L8

Any opinions expressed on this site are solely those of the author and not necessarily held by the Ludwig von Mises Institute of Canada.

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 Canada License.

Copyright © 2015 Ludwig von Mises Institute Canada, Inc. All Rights Reserved.