Blog

The Bank of Canada Should “Cease and Desist”

The Bank of Canada Should “Cease and Desist”
Profile photo of Caleb McMillan

0629poloz-300x2251“Beneath the symbol

We’ll all assemble

Oh how we’ll fly

Oh how we’ll tremble”

— Captain Beefheart, “Ice Cream for Crow”

If interest rates are the symbol beneath of which we all assemble, then there are some bad times ahead.

But Canada’s “leading economists,” say interest rates are “too blunt a tool” to cool the housing market.

Tomorrow the Bank of Canada will deliver a rate decision and an accompanying monetary policy report. Governor Stephen Poloz isn’t expected to raise rates anytime soon, but he’ll likely face some tough questions about the connection between low rates and the “hot” housing market.

Of course, he deserves every hard question thrown at him. And it’s nice that journalists are actually starting to question the obvious connection between low-interest rates and the housing bubble.

With Canadians across the country locked out of their local housing markets, and with foreign buyers using Canadian property to protect their wealth from destructive communist dictatorships, frustration needs an outlet and it looks as if Poloz and the BoC are, finally, in the crosshairs.

But that doesn’t mean Poloz will listen. After all, the central bank is supposed to remain “independent” from democratic government and popular opinion. Poloz is making his decisions based on his misunderstanding of the economy, not the will of the mob.

As Avery Shenfeld, CIBC Capital Markets’ chief economist, told BNN in an email, “The Bank of Canada will likely stick to its view that house prices are best dealt with through macro-prudential policies particular to that market, with the interest rate setting used to steer the economy overall,

Meaning, let the banks and federal government deal with the issue. The BoC will do what it can, but it will not include raising rates.

Raising interest rates will certainly “cool” the housing market, but it will also lead to some unintended consequences that would “hurt” the overall economy.

Remember, the BoC is stacked with Keynesians, who regard the “hangover theory” as implausible as the irrefutable Say’s Law.  

So if the Bank can’t or won’t raise rates, and leaving the price of interest to the free market isn’t even on the table, then what about a rate cut?

Doug Porter, chief economist at BMO Capital Markets, also told BNN, “The BoC should cease and desist with talk of possible further rate cuts, which simply fuel the sense that rates are never going higher, and instead start warning that rates will someday rise.”

That would be smart, we’ll have to see what tomorrow brings.

So far, Bank of Canada governor Stephen Poloz has left real estate to the experts, meaning, not him.

Capital Economics Senior Canada Economist David Madani told BNN that the “Bank of Canada needs to pay more attention to the housing issue because it is a huge threat to the entire economy.”

But Poloz, like his predecessor before him, prefers “moral suasion.” Madani thinks the Bank should be using “much stronger language.”

Oh, how we’ll fly, oh how we’ll tremble.

Blog
Profile photo of Caleb McMillan
@Caleb983

Caleb McMillan is a writer that lives in Vancouver, British Columbia.

More in Blog

The market provides its own punishment for irrelevant discrimination

Patrick BarronMay 20, 2018

Unilateral Free Trade Would Benefit All UK Citizens

Patrick BarronMarch 21, 2018

The EU elite are ignorant of the true meaning and importance of “comparative advantage”

Patrick BarronMarch 15, 2018
stockmarket-300x200

Don’t Trust the “Trump Boom”

Taylor LewisFebruary 20, 2018
santelli1

Inflation has Central Banks Playing Musical Chairs

Doug FrenchFebruary 8, 2018
mueller

What If Things Were Different?

Taylor LewisJanuary 30, 2018
ContainerShip_teaser-300x129

Why Comparative Advantage Matters

Danny LeRoyJanuary 29, 2018

Can an Economy Advance Without Savings?

Patrick BarronJanuary 20, 2018

Bastiat and the Hubble Space Telescope

Patrick BarronJanuary 8, 2018