Public Sector Strikes Need Competition

Public Sector Strikes Need Competition
Profile photo of David Howden

It’s not often police officers and firefighters light fires in the streets (in front of City Hall no less). That’s exactly what happened in Montreal recently, as public union members protested the Quebec government’s intent to reform their municipal pension plans.

The province’s Municipal Affairs Minister Pierre Moreau estimated that these public pensions are currently running a deficit of almost $4 billion.

Part of the shortfall is caused by mismanagement and part by an inability of the government to come to grips with the reality of pension demographics. Retirees are living longer and investment returns are not what they used to be given the current low-interest rate environment. But many municipal workers start working later in life (like police officers and firefighters who go through lengthy training regimes) and retire earlier than private sector workers. The result is few years spent contributing to an already generous pension plan.

To put pressure on the provincial government to not make reforms, 80 firefighters quit on the spot, closing two Montreal fire stations. (This was, one can presume, especially troublesome as this group also had a hand in lighting the street on fire in front of City Hall.)

When private sector pensions are managed incorrectly, the pensioner pays. When returns are less than expected, as they are now, contributors make up the difference. Defined benefit plans, such as Quebec’s public sector enjoys, are almost unheard off any longer. The advantage of knowing in advance what your pension will pay is from a bygone era. Market forces dictate returns, and private pension holders on defined contribution plans get what the market returns on their retirement. There is no reliance on the taxpayer to make up the shortfalls.

Reform of these municipal pensions is not only necessary, it’s fair. One reason reform won’t come is evident in the recent protest.

There is only one group of fire fighters in Montreal. When they go on strike, there is no replacement. The same holds for police, school teachers, and many other public monopolies. When these 80 fire fighters went on strike the citizens of Montreal had no options. It became not a matter of pension reform, but of life and death if someone had a fire!

In contrast, when your local hardware store has pension problems and goes on strike, consumers still have options. Nuts and bolts can be bought from a competitor.

Competition is missing from discussions about pension reform. With no options for these government services, the public is at a complete loss when fire fighters, police, doctors, nurses or teachers strike. As a result these workers have an advantage in negotiations that those in the private sector don’t have. They wield an undue amount of pressure when they sit at the negotiation table during a strike.

If public workers like these fire fighters want to strike, that’s fine. But don’t endanger the public by stopping them from being protected by fire fighting services. Let private competitors fill in the holes. It’s the only way to level the negotiating playing field, and as an added bonus consumers don’t have to fear for their lives because of a simple argument over retirement benefits.

  • Patrick Barron

    A short term option to the ultimate goal of privatizing fire fighting services is to discharge the firefighters. If the Montreal firefighters quit, so be it. Hire new ones, and do not allow those who quit to obtain any other government job. This is the Reagan approach; it worked to defeat the thuggish union who represented the air traffic controllers. As President Calvin Coolidge said, public employees do not have a right to strike anywhere at any time for any reason.

  • Renegade

    > Let private competitors fill in the holes.

    Not gonna happen. The state relies on being a predatory monopoly. The only way that will happen is if the predators are slaughtered and become extinct. Unlikely given their propensity for violence and willingness to offer up a sacrificial lamb to their dark god, the state.

  • Citizen101

    Definitely some good points, I would like to point out as well that most Canadians have an extremely difficult time envisioning services like this not provided by the government. I have tried and tried again to argue that in the absense of governement services people will fulfill their needs via whatever market alternatives emerge. For instance people might need security or some kind of police service, and also things like roads, transport etc and entrepeneurs could/ would meet these needs at a market based price. Also the difference between public vs private unions is lost on almost everyone I've discussed it with… maybe because we are all educated for 14 or so years of our lives by members of public unions?

    • Renegade

      > Canadians have an extremely difficult time envisioning services like this not provided by the government

      That can be extremely frustrating. The way most Canadians scream for more state intervention in their lives is really disturbing.

Profile photo of David Howden

David Howden is Chair of the Department of Business and Economics, and professor of economics at St. Louis University, at its Madrid Campus, Academic Vice President of the Ludwig von Mises Institute of Canada, and winner of the Mises Institute's Douglas E. French Prize. Send him mail.

More in Blog

Screen Shot 2015-11-21 at 10.50.52 AM

The Fed’s Bloody Hands

Doug FrenchNovember 21, 2015

Are Culture, Public Transport, Public Health, Education, and Technology Public Goods?

Ash NavabiNovember 16, 2015

ICPM is This Friday! Meet the Faculty and Register!

Mises CanadaNovember 3, 2015

Everything Is On Sale Compared to 1979

Marian TupyOctober 30, 2015
Money isolated on white  background

First they came for the cash, then they came for the microwaves

David HowdenOctober 30, 2015

The logic of sovereignty and unilateral free trade

Patrick BarronOctober 30, 2015


Mises CanadaOctober 29, 2015

My letter to the WSJ re: Two kinds of refugees, people and money

Patrick BarronOctober 27, 2015

On Symbolism in Science

Ash NavabiOctober 27, 2015