Articles

Limits on Power Are Limits on Oppression

Limits on Power Are Limits on Oppression
Profile photo of Gary Galles

fence-and-snowy-field-in-Knox-Farm-State-Park-East-Aurora-NY-300x1991Reprinted from FEE.org

December 19 marks the birth of John Taylor of Caroline, who remains virtually unknown, despite being called “the most impressive political theorist that America has produced.”

Taylor, who served in the Continental Army, Virginia Legislature and U.S. Senate, was an Antifederalist, opposed to the overpowering central government he believed the Constitution would create. As F. Thornton Miller put it, “For Taylor, the Constitution was of worth only if it could serve the more fundamental cause of liberty.”

Taylor defended liberty and states’ rights, advocated a strict interpretation of the Constitution’s terms against federal overreaching, and vigorously opposed government favors and protectionism, which he called “the most efficacious system of tyranny practicable over civilized nations.”

Taylor’s positions stand abandoned today. Government has become ever more the dispenser of special treatment at others’ expense. That is why Taylor’s 1822 Tyranny Unmasked merits revisiting.

Political liberty consists only in a government constituted to preserve and not to defeat the natural capacity of providing for our own good.

Governments able to do so uniformly sacrifice the national interest to their own.

As no government can patronize one class but at the expense of others…Is not their discord the universal consequence of the fraudulent power assumed by governments of allotting to classes and individuals indigence or wealth.

Payments…extorted to feed either an oppressive government or exclusive privileges… degenerate into actual tyranny.

The only reciprocity produced by [legislative favors] is between the corrupters and corrupted.

If a man should combine with a government to take away another’s property, the tyranny of the act would not be obliterated by the power of an accomplice.

The nation which imagines that… government can by provisions convert fraud into honesty relies upon a moral impossibility for the preservation of its liberty.

Governments, under pretense of supervising the affairs of individuals… enrich themselves and their instruments of oppression.

The treasure extorted beyond the line of honest frugality is uniformly diverted from the end of defending to that of transferring property.

The wealth of nations is best secured by allowing every person, as long as he adheres to the rules of justice, to pursue his own interest in his own way.

Liberty can only be preserved by a frugal government and by excluding frauds for transferring property from one man to another.

How then is tyranny to be ascertained… except as something which takes away our money, transfers our property and comforts to those who did not earn them, and eats the food belonging to others.

The transferring policy seems to suppose that the public has no property; and though legislatures have no moral or constitutional right to give one man’s property to another; yet that by combining the property of all men under the appellation “public,” they acquire both a moral and constitutional right to give the property of all men to one man.

There are two kinds of political economy. One consists of a frugal government, and an encouragement of individuals to earn, by suffering them to use; the other of contrivances for feeding an extravagant government, its parasites and partisans, its sinecures and exclusive privileges… [one] is liberty; the other is tyranny

Government… founded upon a supposed necessity that men must be robbed of their property to preserve social order… invariably terminates in despotism.

A government… able to oppress, must… be weak for the object of preserving liberty…Every innovation which weakens the limitations and divisions of power, alone able to make a government strong for the object of preserving liberty, makes it strong for the object of oppression.

John Taylor of Caroline deserves renewed attention, particularly for his overwhelming arguments derived from what Joseph Stromberg termed “the contrast between those whose property was the creature of political force and fraud and those who earned their property through productive work on the free market.”

As F. Thornton Miller wrote, “Most of Taylor’s world is gone. But, with the continued increase in the power of the federal government and the pursuit of policies that benefit specific constituencies, the principles set out in Tyranny Unmasked are as relevant today as they were in 1822.”

Articles
Profile photo of Gary Galles

Gary M. Galles is a professor of economics at Pepperdine University. He is the author of The Apostle of Peace: The Radical Mind of Leonard Read.

More in Articles

homeless_jesus_sm-249x300

The Rise of the West

Robert HiggsJanuary 19, 2018
ship-300x242

The Anti-Imperialist League and the Battle Against Empire

Thomas E. Woods Jr.January 18, 2018
wall_street-300x224

The Money-Velocity Myth

Frank ShostakJanuary 17, 2018
market

Opportunity and the Entrepreneur

Peter KleinJanuary 16, 2018
The_Soviet_Union_1968_CPA_3606_stamp_('Did_You_Volunteer'_Poster_(D.Moor,_1920)_and_Young_Red_Army)

The Death Cult of Collectivism

Ludwig von MisesJanuary 15, 2018
Bitcoin-coin2-300x230

In Defense of Bitcoin Hoarding

Jeffrey TuckerJanuary 12, 2018
bitcoin-dollars-300x200

Bitcoin Loses Steam as Steam Loses Bitcoin

Matt McAffreyJanuary 11, 2018
Federal_Reserve (1)

Did “Tight” Fed Policy Cause the Financial Crisis?

Robert P. MurphyJanuary 10, 2018
depression

America’s Great Depression and Austrian Business Cycle Theory

Richard EbelingJanuary 9, 2018