Don’t Rage Against the Machine, says Bank of Canada

Don’t Rage Against the Machine, says Bank of Canada
Profile photo of Caleb McMillan

carolyn-wilkinsThat robots will replace jobs and therefore we need a basic income guarantee is perhaps one of the most uncreative ideas imaginable.

And there are two kinds of people in this world — people creative enough to think outside the box and those who aren’t. 

Amazingly, Bank of Canada technocrats sometimes fall into this former category.  Senior Deputy Governor Carolyn “Chaos” Wilkins said robotics will “re-energize underwhelming productivity” in Canada.

After all, you can’t debase the wages machines don’t earn.

Of course, all this hoopla about job losses stems from economic illiteracy. There are always going to be people needed to program and code these robots. Many new technologies have threatened older industry establishments without causing mass starvation and economic deterioration.

The argument for a basic income guarantee is an argument for free money you didn’t earn. Full stop.

So where’s the outrage over the job losses in the candlestick making industry? What about horse-and-buggy taxi carriages?

Why not mimic the old Soviet Union and have the state employ people to endlessly produce steel for no reason?

Why not do one better than the communists and have people believe they are truly doing business in a market while taxing and regulating everything and everyone for desired effect?

That seems to be the way Canada is going, unintended consequences and all.

The Bank of Canada warns of a future where robotics make our lives better, but also create unemployment and income inequality.

Insomuch that robots create unemployment, those people will find new jobs. As for income inequality, there is nothing wrong with that.

A recessionary future has more to do with the Bank’s monetary policy than it does with robots takin er jerbss.

But I can’t help but agree with the BoC technocrat:  “Innovation is always a process of creative destruction, with some jobs being destroyed and, over time, even more jobs being created… We’ve seen this process in action throughout history.”

We’ve also seen where state interventions in the economy have led.

Anymore taxing or regulating of economic actions and soon the whole system will become an all-around bureaucratic order.

And we’ve seen that process in action throughout the 20th century. It wasn’t pretty.

Far from it.

Profile photo of Caleb McMillan

Caleb McMillan is a writer that lives in Vancouver, British Columbia.

More in Blog

Screen Shot 2017-07-25 at 12.27.53 PM

GDP, GPS, & Growth Without Well-Being

Caleb McMillanJuly 25, 2017

The Real EU Aim in Brexit Talks and Why It Will Fail

Patrick BarronJuly 19, 2017

One Fundamental Problem with the Bank of Canada

Caleb McMillanJuly 13, 2017

Bank of Canada Raises Rates for First Time in 7 Years

Caleb McMillanJuly 12, 2017

Who to Blame for the Toronto Housing Bubble?

Caleb McMillanJuly 11, 2017

Trump’s Media Revolution

Taylor LewisJuly 11, 2017

Canada 150 — 2 out of 3 ain’t bad

Caleb McMillanJuly 1, 2017

Why Sound Money Does Not Need a Central Bank, Only the Rule of Law

Patrick BarronJune 26, 2017

BoC Pat on the Back

Caleb McMillanJune 19, 2017